Lib Dems and SNP lose court bid for slot on ITV election debate
Candidate accuses broadcaster of ‘pre-empting decision of the people in a general election’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Liberal Democrats and the SNP will not appear in the first televised debate of the 2019 general election after losing a High Court battle against ITV.
Both parties challenged the decision to only include Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn in a head-to-head debate on Tuesday night – with the Liberal Democrats arguing in court that the “voice of remain had been excluded” from the event.
The Lib Dems have campaigned for inclusion since the debate was first announced – party members and supporters used the hashtag ‘#DebateHer’ to goad Mr Corbyn and Mr Johnson into inviting Jo Swinson to argue her case.
However, two senior judges have said the decision fell outside of the courts’ jurisdiction and that the parties would be better off complaining to broadcasting regulator Ofcom.
Lord Justice Davis, sitting with Mr Justice Warby, said that, even if the court did have jurisdiction to deal with the case, the format of the debates was a matter of “editorial judgment” and there was “no arguable breach of the broadcasting code”.
He added: “The clear conclusion of both members of this court is that, viewed overall, these claims are not realistically arguable.
“It follows that the television debate scheduled for tomorrow evening between the leader of the Conservative Party and the leader of the Labour Party may lawfully go ahead.”
ITV lawyers had already threatened to cancel the debate if the SNP and the Liberal Democrats won their case.
A spokesperson said: “We welcome the court’s decision and will continue with our comprehensive election coverage as planned.”
Lib Dem candidate Layla Moran said it was “outrageous” that no outwardly anti-Brexit party would be present in the debate, adding on Twitter: “It’s simply wrong of broadcasters to present a binary choice and pre-empt the decision of the people in a general election.”
The party vowed to take the matter into future legislation, arguing that such debates should not be left purely to the whim of broadcasters.
Liberal Democrat president Sal Brinton said: “Televised debates between political party leaders should be framed in stronger legislation.
“But more than that, our democracy should not be in the hands of invisible corporate structures, and arrangements for such debates should always be accessible and transparent.
“We will not set our principles aside, we will continue this fight. Not just for this general election, but for our future democracy too.”
The SNP’s leader in Westminster, Ian Blackford, added: “It was already clear that the Westminster political system is utterly broken and incapable of properly representing Scotland’s interests.
“What is now clear is that the UK broadcasting system is similarly incapable. The result of the decision to exclude the SNP is to discriminate against Scottish voters and to effectively treat them as second-class citizens.”
Additional reporting by PA.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments