Lib Dems consider spending alcohol and tobacco taxes on NHS
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DUTY ON alcohol and tobacco should be earmarked for specific National Health Service projects, according to tax reform proposals mooted by a Liberal Democrat working party.
Under suggestions in a working paper, the pounds 12bn a year revenue from smoking and drinking could either be linked directly to the health service in its entirety, or rises in duty dedicated to specific projects such as providing more scanners, or improving NHS dentistry in areas where it has all but died out.
The suggestions are being examined by a Liberal Democrat working group on 'hypothecation' - earmarking - of taxes. Health and education are two of the areas for which revenue could be specifically targeted.
The party struck a chord during the 1992 election with its pledge to spend an extra penny of income tax to fund more education and Paddy Ashdown, the party leader, recently called for full hypothecation of revenues to help overcome public distrust of politicians.
But little serious work has been completed on the practicalities. The group is examining each service area to see whether hypothecation would be workable.
The paper argues for more emphasis on the services people get instead of the amount of tax they pay. Options canvassed include an annual spending statement, delivered to each household. The paper also suggests a local counterpart under which council-tax payers would be told the cost of a one-off capital scheme - a sports complex, for example - and then asked to vote in a local referendum on whether they wished the project to go ahead.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments