Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lib Dem leader backs councillor who said schools should be able to suggest prostitution as career

'It is a wonderful thing that we are in a party where those sort of views can be expressed and you can have that sort of exchanged'

Shaun Connolly
Sunday 18 September 2016 08:56 BST
Comments
Tim Farron has led the Liberal Democrats since 2015
Tim Farron has led the Liberal Democrats since 2015 (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Lib Dem leader Tim Farron insists he will not "slap down" a councillor who questioned why school careers officers cannot suggest prostitution as a line of work for pupils.

Mr Farron said he disagreed with the view, but elected representatives must be allowed to say "shocking things" to stoke debate.

The row flared after the chairman of Cheltenham Lib Dems, Dennis Parsons, told a special session of the party conference that careers officers were not allowed to suggest prostitution as employment, and then added: "Why shouldn't they?"

Mr Farron insisted it was a "wonderful thing" that the Lib Dems are a party where such views can be expressed.

Mr Parsons used a discussion on how to combat the stigma attached to sex work to compare prostitution with accountancy.

He said: "The fact that we are asking 'should we seek to prevent people entering sex work?' is part of the problem. You wouldn't ask the question 'should we prevent people becoming accountants?' You'd just take it for granted.

"There is a stronger case, probably, for that than there is for preventing sex work.

"We have had a chap suggest that one of the areas we need to be concerned about was families coercing people to go into the sex trade. Well, again, you wouldn't protest at families urging and coercing people into becoming accountants.

"And even in this room full of liberals we have got a huge cultural problem that we do see sex work as different, and we see it as something a little bit tacky, and not quite nice, and not the sort of thing that we would want our sons and daughters to get involved in.

"We talk about schools – how many schools are going to have careers officers say to people, 'have you thought about prostitution?'

"It's not going to happen. And that's a cultural thing. Why shouldn't they? Why shouldn't they?"

Mr Farron told the Press Association: "It is a wonderful thing that we are in a party where those sort of views can be expressed and you can have that sort of exchange. They are certainly not my views.

"Drawing the equivalence between sex work and accountancy is not one that I share.

"I think we are in a position where we are a liberal party and it's not for me to go telling anyone that they can't have views and share them. That's how you get to the bottom of these things.

"Actually, if you believe in education – we're talking about careers – then what you really want is for people to be able to explore ideas, and that means sometimes saying things that are quite shocking, really.

"So, no, I'm not going to go slapping people down. The whole point of having a debate is that you test different opinions and you come out with, on the basis of the evidence, the right solution."

Delegates heard that decriminalising prostitution would raise £1bn a year for the Treasury in taxes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in