Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour MPs to rebel on hunting

Jo Dillon,Deputy Political Editor
Sunday 09 March 2003 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Fox-hunting will be banned under a Labour backbench amendment which challenges the Government's preference to license the blood sport.

This week, a majority of the Labour MPs on the committee considering the Hunting Bill – 12 in total – intend to put down a formal amendment to the legislation. Its effect would be a total ban on fox-hunting.

While paying lip service to proposed licensing tribunals, the amendment, added to changes already made to the Bill to outlaw deer-hunting and hare-coursing, would render them irrelevant. The move is likely to win the support of a majority in the Commons.

A second option is an amendment to limit the use of dogs to flush out a fox only, outlawing the chase, and requiring the hunter to kill the fox quickly and humanely.

The decision by Labour MPs, mostly loyal to Mr Blair, is certain either to open up hostilities between the Labour back benches and Mr Blair, or to force him, in the event of the inevitable veto of the ban by the House of Lords, to use the Parliament Act to enact the will of the Commons.

Despite public opinion and repeated promises, including in Labour's election manifestos, to ban hunting, Mr Blair has been reluctant to do so.

But one Labour MP predicted: "He's not going to want to risk being at loggerheads with even more of the party at a time when people don't support his policies on Iraq, the health service and higher education." However, the Bill may take time to progress through Parliament, and the leverage needed to encourage the Mr Blair to use the Parliament Act may be lost.

With that in mind, Rural Affairs minister Alun Michael is charged with the task of getting Labour MPs to agree to licensing. He has held meetings with Labour MPs on the committee as well as with animal welfare charities.

But committee MPs feel compelled towardsbanning hunting altogether. Theyknow that if they do not try, a colleague probably will.

Compromise will not suit the animal rights lobby either. Douglas Bachelor, chief executive of the League Against Cruel Sports, said: "Hunting is a moral issue. There can be no compromise on cruelty and we expect MPs to amend the Bill into a total ban."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in