Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour demand Conservatives return donations from Asil Nadir

 

Oliver Wright
Thursday 23 August 2012 18:02 BST
Comments
Nadir's office in Mayfair earned him the nickname of the Sultan of Berkeley Square
Nadir's office in Mayfair earned him the nickname of the Sultan of Berkeley Square (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour tonight demanded that the Conservatives honoured a pledge to return hundreds of thousands of pounds of donations from the company owned by the fraudster Asil Nadir, following his conviction for theft.

Nadir, who was found guilty on Wednesday of 10 charges of theft from the former conglomerate totalling £29m, was one of the Conservative party's biggest benefactors under Margaret Thatcher, when party donations did not have to be publicly declared.

Accountants investigating Polly Peck found that a subsidiary had made a series of donations to the Conservative party between 1985 and 1990, seemingly without the knowledge of the company's board or shareholders.

Touche Ross, the administrators of Polly Peck, wrote a letter to the party's central office claiming that £365,000 came from money defrauded from the Polly Peck empire.

"It is the contention of the administrator that Mr Nadir is liable to repay the sums concerned as a result of his fraud and/or breach of fiduciary duty and/or malfeasance as a director,” the letter concluded.

"I would urge you to return the donations to Polly Peck so that the creditors can at least obtain some small measure of compensation from this unfortunate affair."

An investigation by parliament in 1993 led to the then Conservative Chairman Norman Fowler (now Lord Fowler) telling the home affairs select committee that the money would be returned should it emerge it had been stolen from shareholders.

"If it is proved that that money was stolen, then clearly that money will be returned. We have absolutely no intention of keeping money of that kind,” he said. His assurance was repeated by the then Prime Minister John Major in 1993.

But today the party seemed less than keen to honour the commitment - saying that it would have to be "proved" that the specific £365,000 in donation had been stolen.

In a statement they said: "We have seen no evidence that money donated to the Conservative Party from the Polly Peck group was stolen. But we have consistently said, as Norman Fowler, then Party Chairman, did in 1993, ”obviously if it is proved that that money was stolen it will be returned'."

However they seemed unclear as to how this could be done to their satisfaction.

Labour called for the Tories to repay the money immediately. In a letter to the Conservative Party Chairman Baroness Warsi the Labour MP Simon Danczuk said it was imperative that she honoured her predecessor's pledge.

"Before the General Election, David Cameron said that our political system "is looking ever more ragged and broken” and that we must act to restore "trust and confidence in politics"," he wrote.

"I hope that you will deliver on both the spirit of the Prime Minister's words and the clear commitment made by your predecessor and the former Prime Minister by repaying these donation."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in