King Coal is dubbed King Canute over Clause IV
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Having failed to resurrect the pro-nationalisation Clause IV, Arthur Scargill yesterday indicated that he was considering leaving the Labour Party, writes Barrie Clement.
Asked if he could remain a member, he replied in the Thatcherite first person plural:"We will have to consider our position."
The miners' leader told the BBC: "I joined this party to change society. I didn't join this party to run capitalism better and more efficiently than the Tories."
Traditionally characterised as King Coal, in the debate over Clause IV yesterday Mr Scargill was accused of being King Canute after he attempted to defend his "birthright" as an "unashamed socialist".
Deserted by former supporters of the party's old testament, the motion presented by the leader of the National Union of Mineworkers was overwhelmingly defeated. Tony Blair was noticeably absent from the platform, putting the finishing touches to his speech on "New Britain", a country presumably not to Mr Scargill's liking. He argued that the special conference on 29 April, which voted by a two-thirds majority to abandon the clause, had been unconstitutional.
Amid sporadic cheers and occasional catcalls Mr Scargill warned delegates that without Clause IV's commitment to the "common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange", Labourwould be no different to the Tories. He told delegates:"If you ditch Clause IV you throw away our birthright and the cornerstone of our constitution which makes us different from the party we are seeking to replace."
He pointed out that unions had created the Labour Party and the leadership was now guilty of the "theft" of the constitution. Mr Scargill said he had joined the party to fight the "ruthless and corrupt" system of capitalism."We must have a philosophy which is fundamentally different to those which support the free market."
He received prolonged applause from significant sections of the conference, but many of those delegates then went on to vote against him.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments