Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kelly family demand answer from MoD

James Lyons
Sunday 24 August 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Dr David Kelly's family demanded to know who was briefing against him in the days after his death, it emerged last night.

A solicitor representing his widow Janice asked who had authorised the infamous suggestion that the scientist was a "Walter Mitty". The Prime Minister's official spokesman Tom Kelly was eventually forced to admit he used the term .

But solicitor Peter Jacobsen suggested MoD officials were responsible and demanded answers in a letter to Government lawyers. "I am aware of press reports quoting unnamed MoD spokesmen," Mr Jacobsen wrote. "For example, may I refer you to the leading article on page 1 of The Independent of Monday 4th August where, inter alia, it is asserted that, according to MoD sources, Dr Kelly was being investigated for his contacts with journalists long before the current difficulties; a copy is attached.

"If information of this nature is being disseminated ...I should like to know on whose authority this is being done. On the other hand the Government for every good reason is calling for restraint during the course of the Inquiry...on the other hand various arms of Government appear at least through the press to be following a different course.

"If the report is true, may I please have details of the investigation?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in