Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Kelly 'believed Saddam had WMD'

James Lyons,Political Correspondent,Pa News
Wednesday 21 January 2004 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Dr David Kelly believed Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and might have used them, it was revealed today.

But government weapons expert Dr Kelly said it could take "days or weeks" to deploy them and suggested the Iraqi leader would only do it if attacked.

Dr Kelly was found dead at a beauty spot after being identified as the source of BBC claims that Downing Street "sexed up" intelligence on Iraq.

Tony Blair presented a dossier to MPs saying "military planning allows for some of the WMD to be ready within 45 minutes".

Speaking to BBC's Panorama a month later, in October 2002, Dr Kelly said the Iraqi dictator did pose an "immediate threat".

On WMD, he said: "Even if they're not actually filled and deployed today, the capability exists to get them filled and deployed within a matter of days and weeks."

At Westminster MPs questioned why the BBC had not produced the previously undisclosed interview to the Hutton inquiry or before.

Labour's Chris Bryant questioned whether the Corporation's governors could have seen it before rushing to defend correspondent Andrew Gilligan's accusations about Number 10.

"It seems very curious that this footage has only just come to light now," Mr Bryant said.

"I would have thought it could have played a helpful role both in the BBC governors' assessment of the rights and wrongs of Andrew Gilligan's report and the subsequent Hutton inquiry.

"I wonder whether the governors knew of the existence of this."

Tory MP Robert Jackson added: "If this interview appears to have been relevant to the inquiry, the BBC has questions to answer."

Dr Kelly was Britain's foremost expert on Saddam's biological weapons and says in tonight's progrramme that they posed a "real threat" to neighbouring countries.

"We are talking about Iran and Israel and certainly he can use those weapons against them and you don't need a vast stockpile to have a tremendous military effect," he said.

His remarks, which have not been made public before, were posted on the BBC's website ahead of a special edition of Panorama on BBC1 at 8.30pm tonight.

It is being broadcast a week before Lord Hutton publishes the findings of his inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of Dr Kelly.

Saddam posed a much lesser threat than he had prior to the first Gulf War, Dr Kelly told Panorama.

"Iraq's intrinsic capability has been reduced since 1990/1," the former UN weapons inspector said.

But British intelligence had sizeable gaps in its knowledge of Iraq's WMD, he revealed.

Asked about how Iraq might launch biological agents, he said: "The actual form, we don't really know.

"He would have been planning to develop them and have far better and fare more effective systems and those we are completely unsighted of and we're unsighted as to whether that work has continued since 1991 to this very day."

Dr Kelly suggested Saddam might have used his arsenal only if attacked.

"I think he would use them. Of course, what is more difficult to answer is how and under what circumstances he would use them," he said.

"I think some people would consider that when the chips are really down, and he's fighting his last battle, that he may be prepared to use them.

"I think he would be reluctant to use them in the build-up to war - in the transition to war - because he knows what the response would be.

"It would be utterly devastating for him."

The BBC said later in a statement: "A transcript was disclosed to Lord Hutton while the Inquiry was sitting."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in