JobCentre staff warned of risk from angry claimants
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BY PATRICIA WYNN DAVIES
Political Correspondent
JobCentre staff are at risk of assault and abuse from unemployed claimants angry about the Jobseekers' Allowance, according to leaked confidential advice to employment ministers.
A report in January by senior Employment Service health and safety assessors urged the introduction of "clear escape routes" and personal alarms in some instances, warning that "the impact of the changes is expected to lead to more occasions when jobseekers will receive unpalatable and unwelcome information. It is the view of the assessors that the introduction of JSA will increase the level of risk of actual and attempted assault and verbal abuse ... and that appropriate remedial measures will be required to reduce this risk."
The change will cut unemployment benefit from 12 to six months, subject claimants to new and rigorous Jobseeker Agreements and disqualify some people altogether.
The conclusions, leaked to Alan Milburn, Labour MP for Darlington, also took account of the new Incapacity Benefit, which comes into force from tomorrow and will bring on to the unemployment register people facing reduced benefits, "some of whom will be suffering from mental illness", and likely frustrations of social fund applications being turned down.
The 15-page document spotlights a range of factors that have contributed to raising the overall "low" risk of assault to "medium" without an increase in the level of protection offered.
These include "unwelcome news" in the form of waiting days, disagreements over contents of Jobseeker Agreements, "reaction" to benefit sanctions, and lack of privacy for discussion of personal matters.
Ministers will be anxious to avoid a rerun of the persistent abuse suffered by Child Support Agency staff. But Mr Milburn said that employment ministers had deliberately ignored warnings about safety when the Jobseekers' Bill went through its Commons committee and remaining stages from 24 January - the report was dated 12 January. He claims the Jobseekers' Allowance "threatens to turn JobCentres into fortresses".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments