Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Jeremy Hunt launches Tory fightback over Labour’s ‘disgraceful, fake news, lie’

The chancellor said the election will be about how the two main parties deal with Britain’s record tax burden

David Maddox
Political editor
Friday 17 May 2024 11:13 BST
Comments
Hunt attacks Labour and says he refutes 'myths' the economy is worse under Tories

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jeremy Hunt accused Labour of telling “a lie” about Tory tax plans as he launched his party’s fightback in the week that saw the starting gun fired for the election campaign.

In an unusually fiery speech, the chancellor claimed that Labour’s attempt to scare voters about the future of the state pension was “disgraceful”.

He also alleged that “the most conservative estimate” had concluded that Sir Keir Starmer’s spending plans would cost £38.5bn, meaning that “Labour will have no choice but to put up taxes further” to fill a £10bn black hole in government finances by 2028-29.

Mr Hunt acknowledged that “difficult decisions” had been needed because of the global financial shock brought about by the Covid pandemic, and said that the war in Ukraine had forced him to increase taxes. However, he insisted that the election “will be framed [by] what the parties want to do about the tax burden”.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has attacked Labour’s economic plans
Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has attacked Labour’s economic plans (PA Wire)

He added: “There is a choice. The Labour Party does not want, and a future Labour government does not want, to cut the tax burden. A future Conservative government will. That is the big choice in British politics, and our argument is, this isn’t just about family budgets.”

He went on: “We understand how important those are when it comes to cost-of-living pressures. Our argument is, this is about the future growth of the economy, because we can see looking around the world that more lightly taxed economies have more dynamic private sectors, they grow faster, and, in the end, that is more money for precious public services like the NHS.”

Labour hit back, saying that Mr Hunt wanted “to distract attention” from his “unfunded £46bn” pledge to end national insurance.

And, while Mr Hunt said he would gradually bring down national insurance – which he described as “the double tax on work” – he was unable to give a timeframe or commit to any other tax cuts, including raising the thresholds for higher rates of income tax.

A Labour spokesperson said: “This is another desperate attempt by the Tories to deflect from their £46bn unfunded tax plan that could lead to higher borrowing, higher taxes on pensioners, or the end of the state pension as we know it.

“All of Labour’s policies are fully costed and fully funded. Unlike the Conservatives, who crashed the economy, Labour will never play fast and loose with the public finances.

“Jeremy Hunt would be better [off] getting Rishi Sunak to confirm the date of the election, rather than putting out any more of these dodgy dossiers.”

Mr Hunt’s speech came on the day when another poll put his party 23 points behind Labour, and the day after Sir Keir and his top team in effect launched their own election campaign in the target Essex seat of Thurrock.

Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves told the rally that the “stability” of the economy would be Labour’s top priority – with “Deliver economic stability” being at the top of a list of six “first steps” on Sir Keir’s pledge card.

Rachel Reeves sets out Labour’s economic plans during a speech in Purfleet, Essex, on Thursday
Rachel Reeves sets out Labour’s economic plans during a speech in Purfleet, Essex, on Thursday (PA Wire)

Labour warned that scrapping national insurance would mean a reduction in the state pension or a rise in the retirement age to 75.

Mr Hunt described this claim as “disgraceful”. He branded Labour’s claims “a myth”, and when pushed further, he added: “It is a lie, fake news, an absolute disgrace by trying to scare pensioners about a policy that is not true.”

However, the chancellor struggled to identify where the money to pay for other tax cuts might come from, having identified cutting national insurance as his priority to help boost growth.

He declined to give a “cast-iron guarantee” of tax cuts, while insisting that the tax burden would come down under a future Conservative government.

Mr Hunt said: “If you’re saying, can I look into a crystal ball and predict what is going to happen in the world in the next five or 10 years, and therefore give you a cast-iron guarantee of when we will be able to reduce the tax burden and to what level, the answer is of course I can’t, and it would be irresponsible to do so.”

But he also signalled a desire to cut taxes further in the autumn, following the 2p cut to national insurance in the spring Budget, and to scrap national insurance altogether in the future.

“If we can afford to go further, responsibly, to reduce the double tax on work this autumn, that is what I will do,” he said. “Because over time, we make no apology for wanting to keep cutting the double tax on work until it is gone, but only when we can do so without increasing borrowing, and without cutting funding for public services or pensions.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in