Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Jeremy Corbyn winning Labour leadership could threaten Tory plans to bomb Isis in Syria

The leading candidate is opposed to extending the RAF bombing campaign

Kunal Dutta
Tuesday 04 August 2015 00:46 BST
Comments
Allies of Jeremy Corbyn, pictured, accused the shadow Chancellor Chris Leslie of deliberately misrepresenting his economic policies as they moved to the heart of the debate in the Labour leadership contest
Allies of Jeremy Corbyn, pictured, accused the shadow Chancellor Chris Leslie of deliberately misrepresenting his economic policies as they moved to the heart of the debate in the Labour leadership contest (AFP/Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Commons vote to extend UK airstrikes of Isis positions in Syria could be postponed if Jeremy Corbyn becomes Labour leader.

Three of the candidates in Labour's leadership race - Andy Burnham, Yvette Cooper and Liz Kendall - have left the door open to supporting action in Syria.

But Jeremy Corbyn, the left-wing candidate, opposes extending the RAF bombing campaign, and has previously warned: "The US is already bombing Syria and this has not stopped Isis. We need to cut off the supply of money and arms that is flowing to Isis."

Having suffered defeat in the last vote on military action in Syria two years ago, David Cameron is cautious about pressing ahead without the opposition's support.

While the Commons returns on 7 September, Mr Cameron is expected to wait until after Labour's new leader is elected on 12 September before pushing the issue to a vote. Ministers have said they would take account of public and parliamentary opinion.

But Mr Corbyn’s selection as Labour leader would present a challenge to the Prime Minister. Mr Corbyn, a veteran member of CND, wants Britain to pull out of Nato and would almost certainly oppose the extension of air strikes as leader.

“The PM is unlikely to want to go ahead unless he has the consent of the leader of the opposition,” a senior Whitehall source told The Times.

Harriet Harman, the acting Labour leader, has said the party would consider "very, very seriously" backing air strikes in Syria and the opposition has said it is ready to work with the Government on a plan to defeat Isis.

Options open to Mr Cameron include holding the vote in the week before Labour announces its new leader. There is one week of parliamentary business, including prime minister’s questions, before then.

But this is likely to generate accusations of bad faith from some Labour figures, who think that Mr Cameron should wait until the new leader is in place.

Two Tory chairmen of select committees have previously expressed alarm about action against Isis in Syria. Julian Lewis, who chairs the Defence Select Committee, has warned that the move would help the Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad. Crispin Blunt, who chairs the Foreign Affairs Committee, said the extension of air strikes in SyRIA would make no difference.

Last week an opinion poll conducted for The Independent found 67 per cent of the public support air strikes against Isis in Syria as well as in Iraq, while 33 per cent opposed the proposal.

However, the survey of 2,000 people by ORB found that a majority would oppose the use of UK ground troops and tanks against the terrorist group in the two countries. This idea was rejected by 59 per cent to 41 per cent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in