Jeremy Corbyn forced to backtrack over apparent support for antisemitic mural
Painting depicted a group of businessmen and bankers playing a Monopoly-style board game, balanced on the backs of people
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Jeremy Corbyn has been forced to backtrack over his apparent support for an antisemitic mural, after a protest from one of his MPs.
Luciana Berger publicly demanded an explanation after being alerted to a Facebook post by the Labour leader opposing the graphic’s removal.
Painted in London’s East End in 2012, by a graffiti artist known as Mear One, it depicted a group of businessmen and bankers playing a Monopoly-style board game balanced on the backs of people.
The mural was painted on the end wall of a private property, but was removed by local authorities after complaints from residents.
In his post responding to its imminent destruction, Mr Corbyn said: “Why? You are in good company. Rockerfeller (sic) destroyed Diego Viera's mural because it includes a picture of Lenin.”
His office was forced to issue a statement after Ms Berger, a Liverpool MP, posted a screengrab on Twitter, saying: “I asked the Leader’s Office for an explanation about this Facebook post first thing this morning. I’m still waiting for a response.”
Later, a spokesperson for Mr Corbyn said: “In 2012, Jeremy was responding to concerns about the removal of public art on grounds of freedom of speech.
“However, the mural was offensive, used antisemitic imagery, which has no place in our society, and it is right that it was removed.”
However, the statement was immediately criticised by Ms Berger as “wholly inadequate”. She added: “It fails to understand on any level the hurt and anguish felt about Antisemitism. I shall be raising this further.”
In a statement, the Jewish Labour Movement said: “Antisemitic art is antisemitism. It cannot be defended under any circumstances.”
The artist himself denied being anti-Semitic, saying the mural is about “class and privilege” and contains a group of bankers “made up of Jewish and white Anglos”.
In 2012, in protest at the removal, he posted: “Tomorrow they want to buff my mural. Freedom of expression. London calling. Public art.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments