Jail 'wrong approach' to child sex abuse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MOST child sex abusers should receive treatment, not imprisonment, according to a report published yesterday. The report called for a new approach with the emphasis on therapy rather than punishment.
The National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders (Nacro) report said that jailing sex abusers could make the plight of the child victims worse.
The prospect of prosecution and imprisonment could deter abusers from admitting their guilt, it claimed, forcing children to face the ordeal of a trial. And the report said that victims were less likely to report cases of abuse if they thought it might lead to their home breaking up.
The report noted that in Germany, Sweden, Italy and Belgium abusers were more likely to receive voluntary long-term therapy than imprisonment.
In the Netherlands, only a small proportion of child abusers were prosecuted - instead help was offered to the victim, perpetrator and family. The trend in Britain was to prosecute and imprison the offender.
The report said national and local strategies were needed to develop treatment programmes. 'This is important to provide the possibility of treatment as an alternative to prosecution, to provide the courts with a wider range of options for sentencing in sexual abuse cases, to ensure that prisoners who are not eligible for the prison service treatment programmes can be referred elsewhere, and to develop follow-up programmes for those who have taken part in the ones in prison,' it said.
The report accepted that prison was still the only answer for a minority of dangerous and disturbed offenders.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments