Increase fines to prevent another BHS-style pension scandal, MPs say
The Work and Pensions Committee has called for reforms of The Pensions Regulator
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government should dramatically increase fines for companies that shirk their pension fund responsibilities in order to see off another future BHS-style scandal, MPs have recommended.
The House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee said giving The Pensions Regulator (TPR) increased powers would act as a “nuclear deterrent” to unscrupulous employers and prevent employees getting short-changed.
Some 20,000 BHS pensioners are facing cuts to their promised pensions after former owner Sir Philip Green saw the firm’s fund go from a £43m surplus in 2000 to a £345m deficit by 2015.
The new report also calls for new powers for the regulator, including the ability to consolidate smaller schemes into a statutory fund and to otherwise renegotiate restructurings for schemes to stop them collapsing.
The MPs recommended that TPR should be reformed into a “nimbler, more proactive” regulator that would be expected to intervene sooner when company pension schemes appeared to be in difficulty and before problems mount up.
Frank Field, the Labour MP who chairs the committee, said he hoped that “never again” would problems such as those seen at BHS again emerge.
“It is difficult to imagine the Pensions Regulator would still be having to negotiate with Sir Philip Green if he had been facing a bill of £1bn, rather than £350m. He would have sorted the pension scheme long ago,” he said.
“The measures we set out in this report are intended to reduce the chance of another scheme going down the BHS route.
“We hope and expect that we will never again see a company like BHS be able to come up with a 23-year recovery plan for its pension fund, and certainly not that it would take the Regulator two years to really begin to do anything about it.”
A spokesperson for the Department for Work and Pensions said it would soon be publishing a review of pensions rules.
“The majority of employers are managing their pension schemes responsibly but a few recent examples have raised some important questions,” he said.
“In the coming months we’ll be publishing a Green Paper on pension funding and as part of this we’ll be looking at powers of the Pensions Regulator.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments