Staff shortages and Home Office delays stopping inspectors from holding government to account, chief inspector says

Independent inspectors say immigration system 'does not have the capacity, and some instance the capabilities' to perform as it should

Benjamin Kentish
Political Correspondent
Tuesday 02 July 2019 15:43 BST
Comments
Why is the Home Office getting so many immigration decisions wrong?

Staff shortages and a lack of interest from politicians are stopping the immigration inspectorate from holding the Home Office to account, the head of the organisation has said.

In a damning report, David Bolt, the independent chief inspector of borders and immigration, said his force had been able to employ less than half the number of inspectors that it is supposed to.

25 inspectors are supposed to work as part of the body but only 11 were in post at the end of March 2019.

In his annual report, Mr Bolt wrote: "For most of the year, the inspectorate operated with well under its complement of 30 staff. For the last few months of 2018‑19 only half of the inspector posts were filled."

Describing staffing as "a problem throughout the year", he said the organisation was supposed to employ 30 people, including 25 inspectors, throughout 2018-19 . However, it began the year with just 23 staff, of which only 18 were inspectors.

During the year, 11 inspectors left and a further five had to go on leave for various reasons. Some were replaced but the organisation ended the 2018-19 year with just 11 inspectors.

While some replacements have since been recruited, Mr Bolt said the inspectorate would be "significantly under strength for at least the first half of 2019-20".

Mr Bolt also claimed that his work has "slipped down the agenda" at the Home Office, highlighting the fact that he had just one meeting with Sajid Javid, the home secretary, last year.

He said: "During 2018-19, I had just one meeting with the home secretary and two with the immigration minister. While I recognise the considerable pressures on ministers, particularly over this period, this added to my sense that the [inspectorate's] work had slipped down the agenda."

The chief inspector also criticised Home Office delays in publish the inspectorate's reports.

In one case, a report was sent to Mr Javid in early July but was not published until late November - more than four months later. None of the seven reports were released within the Home Office target of eight weeks.

The reports were often highly damning of Home Office operations.

Mr Bolt said: "Overall, they painted a by now familiar picture of a system (or more accurately a set of related but not always connected or coherent functions) that does not have the capacity, and in some instances the capabilities, to do everything required of it all of the time, with the result that some things are not done well or not at all."

He complained of a reluctance to improve and learn from past mistakes, claiming the Home Office "appeared closed to the idea that there was any room for improvement" to its refugee resettlement programme and saying the Border Force "believes it knows best and will make changes only on its own terms and at its own pace".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in