Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Imam who asked Tory candidates about ‘consequences of words’ is suspended over ‘antisemitic’ tweets

Abdullah Patel previously suggested critics of Jeremy Corbyn were on ‘Zionist payroll’ and proposed moving Israel to the USA

Benjamin Kentish
Political Correspondent
Wednesday 19 June 2019 16:00 BST
Comments
Boris Johnson fails to answer question on 'letterbox' comments towards Muslims

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An imam who questioned the Tory leadership candidates during a live TV debate has been suspended from his job as a primary school teacher after a row over allegedly ​antisemitic tweets.

Abdullah Patel was removed from his duties as deputy head of Al-Ashraf Primary School in Gloucester after it emerged that he had previously said critics of Jeremy Corbyn were “on the Zionist’s payroll”.

He also suggested that the state of Israel should be moved to the USA, called Gaza “the modern day Auschwitz” and claimed that some women who are assaulted by men are partially to blame.

During a BBC debate on Tuesday night, Mr Patel asked the Conservative leadership contenders if they believed that “words have consequences” – a question widely seen as a reference to Boris Johnson’s past comments about Muslim women who wear the veil looking like “letterboxes”.

The imam’s own words prompted an angry backlash when his social media posts, which date back to 2014, were uncovered within minutes of the debate finishing.

As the row deepened, the Al-Madani Educational Trust, which runs the school, said Mr Patel had been suspended “with immediate effect”.

In a statement posted on the school’s website, Yakub Patel, chair of the trust, said: “Following some of the comments attributed to Mr Patel in the media this morning, the trust has decided to suspend him from all school duties with immediate effect until a full investigation is carried out. The school and trust do not share the views attributed to him.”

The BBC defended its vetting processes and claimed the imam had deactivated his Twitter account before taking part in the programme.

It said: “We carried out background research into the online and social media profiles of all our questioners for last night’s debate. Following the debate, one individual reactivated a public Twitter account he had previously deactivated, whose tweets were not visible during our research period.

“Had we been aware of the views he expressed there, he would not have been selected.”

Speaking to BBC Radio Gloucestershire, Mr Patel insisted he had been criticising “Israel’s policy” rather than the Jewish community.

He said: “The criticism was not of the Jewish community because if you go through my tweets, you’d see support for the Jewish community.

“They’re our brothers and sisters, and the Jewish community and I – especially in Gloucester – work very closely together. We actually visited a synagogue just a while ago.”

The BBC faced further questions after it emerged that another one of the questioners had previously worked for the Labour Party.

Aman Thakar, who called on the leadership candidates to call a general election if they became prime minister, stood as a Labour council candidate in Southwark last year and was previously employed at the party’s headquarters as a “legal assistant”, dealing with disciplinary cases.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in