Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Key Corbyn ally demanding 'justice for miners' under fire over £165,000 pay-out from their union

'I wouldn’t expect to get a redundancy payment when I move from doing one job to another. Couldn’t that money have been better spent on miners’ welfare?'

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 04 December 2019 13:36 GMT
Comments
Ian Lavery won't say why the minors' union paid off his mortgage

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A key ally of Jeremy Corbyn who is fronting a campaign about justice for miners is under fire over why their union paid him £165,000, partly because he left to become an MP.

Ian Lavery was told the money would have been “better spent on miners’ welfare”, when confronted on the campaign trail by a reporter.

“Why do you need to have redundancy just when you switch from being a union official?” the Labour party chairman was asked.

But Mr Lavery refused to answer questions about the controversy, which saw him lent £72,500 for a house from the Northumberland branch of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) when he was branch general secretary.

The loan was written off 13 years later and the shadow cabinet member also received nearly £90,000 in “termination payments” from the union when he left to stand as an MP in 2010.

Although he volunteered to repay £15,000, a regulator’s report found this was less than the £30,600 the union believed it had overpaid.

The episode is receiving fresh attention after Mr Lavery appeared in a video vowing to “bring justice to mineworkers” and accusing the Conservatives of stealing the miners’ pension fund.

“Haven’t you got a bit of cheek doing that when you received £165,000 or so from the NUM for redundancy and for paying off your mortgage,” asked Michael Crick, the veteran political reporter.

“I wouldn’t expect to get a redundancy payment when I move from doing one job to another. Couldn’t that money have been better spent on miners’ welfare?”

But Mr Lavery, who is defending the seat of Wansbeck, in Northumberland, turned on Mr Crick and accused him of trying to “interrogate” him.

“What’s your wages?” he asked, also attacking the reporter for “making things personal” and telling him to “be grown up about things”.

“Can we get onto something which is really serious with regard to the mineworkers’ pension scheme” Mr Lavery said.

The 2017 report, by the Certification Office for Trade Unions and Employers' Associations, said the original loan made to Mr Lavery, in 1994, was at below market rate.

It was written off 13 years later when an endowment policy taken out against it failed to perform as expected. Mr Lavery and his wife kept £18,000 from the endowment policy, the report found.

When it was published, the MP said: “Under my stewardship the union always complied with the rules and the certification officer signed off every year's transactions.

"As the certification officer's report makes clear, no member of the union, past or present, has made a complaint about the financial affairs of the union.

“This report should draw a line under almost two years of allegations and innuendo directed at me and my former colleagues.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in