Hutton threatens benefits crackdown
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Persistent claimants who refuse help to find work have been warned that they could lose their benefits. John Hutton, the Work and Pensions Secretary, announced a government crackdown on what he called the "can work - won't work" culture.
"We need to ask whether we should expect more from those who remain on Jobseeker's Allowance for long periods of time in return for the help we provide," Mr Hutton said in a speech to the Institute for Public Policy Research.
He also said that immigration from eastern Europe had shown up the unwillingness of some Britons to take up available jobs.
There are about 950,000 people claiming Jobseekers' Allowance, of whom 100,000 have spent six of the last seven years on benefit.
The Liberal Democrats' Work and Pensions spokesman, David Laws, said: "If the Government had any serious plans to withdraw benefits from the long-term unemployed, presumably these proposals would already be in the Welfare Reform Bill - which they are not."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
0Comments