Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hutton leak inquiry 'is yet another whitewash'

Colin Brown Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 12 August 2004 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Senior Conservative MPs last night branded an investigation into the leaking of the Hutton inquiry report as "a second whitewash".

An official investigation failed to establish how the findings from the final report of Lord Hutton's inquiry, which cleared Tony Blair of blame for the death of Dr David Kelly, were leaked to The Sun newspaper hours ahead of publication. A statement from the inquiry's office said: "The source of the leak remains unknown."

Richard Ottaway, a Conservative frontbench spokesman who questioned Dr Kelly when he was a member of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, said: "This is not only a second whitewash. It is a complete waste of the taxpayers' money. Everyone knows it was No 10."

The Sun's political editor, Trevor Kavanagh, told the BBC yesterday he was surprised the inquiry had not asked to speak to him about the source of the leak. "I wouldn't have told them anything ... but you never know I might have fainted and confessed everything," he said.

It would at least have shown that the inquiry was a serious one and was following the proper procedures, Kavanagh said. He added that it now seemed the leak inquiry was a "long and pointless exercise" designed to "cover their blushes" at the findings being leaked.

It was claimed the timing of the leak - on the morning the Hutton report was to be published - gave the advantage to the Government by announcing that Mr Blair and key ministers had been cleared of all blame over the death of Dr Kelly, the weapons expert who was implicated in the BBC story that No 10 had "sexed-up" a dossier on Iraqi weapons.

Fingers were pointed at Alastair Campbell, Mr Blair's former director of communications, but Mr Campbell denied leaking the document. Copies of the report were held under strict security and delivered to Downing Street and ministers involved in the inquiry 24 hours before publication.

Michael Howard, the Leader of the Opposition, was denied any sight of the report until 6am on the day of publication. He was allowed to see a copy under lock and key at the Cabinet Office. By then, he had read in The Sun that Mr Blair and Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, had been completely exonerated. The newspaper said on its front page: "Blair cleared of sneaky ploy to name Kelly" and "Hoon off the hook...but mild rap for MoD." It said Lord Hutton had found that Dr Kelly had been wrong to meet the BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan and may have committed suicide because he had felt he was "in disgrace". The report added that the BBC was at fault for broadcasting Mr Gilligan's "unfounded" story.

Dr Kelly killed himself in July last year after being named as the source for BBC reporter's story claiming the Government exaggerated its 2002 dossier on Iraqi weapons.

Mr Howard told friends he was speechless when he saw the report for the first time, and said it had brought judicial reviews into disrepute.

The Hutton statement yesterday said Martin Smith, the inquiry solicitor, "carried out a full and careful investigation but was unable to discover the source". It added: "No particular weaknesses in the measures which were taken to guard the confidentiality of the report were found."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in