Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

UK human rights record and Rwanda deportation plan attacked at UN review

Treatment of asylum seekers and shredding of Human Rights Act come under fire in Geneva

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 10 November 2022 21:10 GMT
Comments
āœ•
Close
Archbishop of Canterbury criticises Rwanda policy during Easter message

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The UKā€™s plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda and tear up the Human Rights Act have been fiercely criticised at a United Nations review.

Rishi Sunakā€™s government suffered the embarrassment of countries ranging from the United States and Germany to Angola questioning its human rights record, at the gathering in Geneva.

Washington highlighted how the UN refugee agency has raised the alarm about the intention ā€œto send asylum seekers to third countriesā€, starting with Rwanda.

New Zealand called on the UK to ā€œensure its treatment of asylum seekers is consistent with its commitments under internationalĀ humanĀ rightsĀ law and international refugee lawā€.

Both Germany and Belgium raised fears the Human Rights Act overhaul would undermine commitment to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) ā€“ with a potential impact on the Brexit trade deal.

Switzerland questioned why the UK allows unlimited detention of asylum seekers ā€“ as controversy rages over the ā€œwretchedā€ conditions at the Manston processing centre.

Canada wanted assurance that ā€œthe current level of human rights protections provided by the Human Rights Act of 1998, including the rights of asylum seekers, are maintained under any legislative reformā€.

And Angola highlighted the cost of living crisis in the UK, suggesting ā€œan emergency poverty strategyā€ to ease the pain for ā€œthe most affectedā€ people.

It means a country where more than half the population survives on less than Ā£1.75 a day is pointing the finger at the sixth-largest economy in the world.

The move follows the UN poverty envoyā€™s warning, last week, that ā€œausterity mark twoā€ in next weekā€™s autumn statement, could breach human rights obligations and worsen hunger.

Yasmine Ahmed, UK director of the organisation Human Rights Watch, warned the UKā€™s international reputation was in danger, at the regular review by the UN Human Rights Council.

ā€œThis review of the UKā€™s human rights record could not be timelier. The slide towards becoming a human rights pariah will be of grave concern to the international community,ā€ she told The Independent.

Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesperson, said: ā€œBritain was once the envy of the world for its proud tradition of respecting peopleā€™s rights and privacy. Yet ministers are shamelessly hellbent on trashing that reputation.

ā€œTodayā€™s events at the UN must be a warning shot to Dominic Raab and Suella Braverman on their disgraceful plans to rip up the Human Rights Act.ā€

ā€œHopefully, the international spotlight will make the UK rethink its zealous attacks on human rights and change course. Failure to do so risks emboldening autocrats.ā€

The review came as a new poll for The Independent shows voters do not trust the government to deal with the small boats crisis, or believe the Rwanda plan will work.

But, in Geneva, junior British justice minister Mike Freer fought back, saying: ā€œThe United Kingdom has a long, proud tradition of providing a home for people fleeing persecution and oppression.ā€

He insisted the Rwanda plan ā€“ stalled by a court challenge ā€“ would ā€œmake the system fairer and more effective, so that we can better protect and support those in genuine need of asylumā€.

ā€œOur immigration and asylum systems and processes have been subject to significant strain over the last decade and continue to face enormous challenges,ā€ Mr Freer argued.

The Home Office has argued the Rwanda deportation plan can cut the number of small boat crossings across the English Channel, but its own top civil servant disputed the claim.

Ms Braverman, the scandal-hit home secretary, sparked outrage by describing the arrival of an unprecedented 38,000 people this year as an ā€œinvasionā€, adopting the language of the far right.

A new Bill of Rights will fulfil the Conservativeā€™s goal of replacing Labourā€™s Human Rights Act, but critics warn it will rip up vital protections.

The idea was dumped by Liz Trussā€™s short-lived premiership ā€“ but has been revived by Mr Raab, reappointed as justice secretary.

The UK has been criticised before at the five-yearly UN review, but the last verdict ā€“ in 2017 ā€“ was before the high-profile controversies of asylum deportations and lengthy detentions.

In one notable area the UK has moved, by finally agreeing to open talks with Mauritius over handing over the Chagos Islands, after years of resistance.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in