Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Human rights leader criticises Lockerbie decision process

Andy Philip,Press Association
Sunday 23 August 2009 10:04 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Allowing politicians to make final decisions in cases such as the Lockerbie bomber is a "serious weakness" in the system, a human rights chief said today.

Alan Miller, chairman of the Scottish Human Rights Commission, called for reform amid international scrutiny over the release of the Libyan man convicted of the 1988 terror atrocity.

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, who has terminal cancer, was allowed home from jail on compassionate grounds on Thursday following a ruling by Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill.

"Yes, he made the right call for the right reasons, " Mr Miller said. "But it should not have been in his gift to do so.

"Allowing a politician to be the final decision maker over the liberty or detention of any individual is a serious weakness in the system. It unnecessarily and unhelpfully politicises the decision and the decision making process."

Mr Miller said an independent tribunal or court should replace the current system.

His comments were posted on the commission's website as pressure continued to mount on Mr MacAskill for the controversial decision.

The SNP's opponents have heaped criticism on former lawyer, who has also been the target of American political anger.

Mr Miller added: "To his credit MacAskill appears to have taken the views of everyone into account when reaching his views, but the system should not support this level of political involvement."

He said the human rights of victims, their families and Megrahi had not been "recognised or respected" in the 20 years since Pan Am Flight 103 was blown from the sky.

A "fair trial" and second appeal would have recognised these rights, he added.

Mr Miller accused the UK Government of withholding documents during the appeal process - which was formally abandoned by Megrahi at the High Court in Edinburgh on Tuesday.

He said: "The length of time taken to attempt to resolve the issue has contributed to the situation we have now reached where Megrahi's deteriorating health has regrettably brought the appeal process to an end.

"The UK Government has denied both the relatives of the victims and Megrahi their rights with these actions, and the public interest requires that all material documents are now released."

The commission was established last year through an Act of Parliament.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in