Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Howard to compromise over right to silence

Colin Brown,Chief Political Correspondent
Friday 11 February 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CROWN COURT clerks could be given the task of warning juries about defendants who abuse the right to silence in a move by Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, to overcome opposition to the Criminal Justice Bill by judges.

In spite of rising speculation, the Home Secretary has told colleagues he will not perform a U-turn. He has told ministers that he is determined not to give way on the principle in clause 28 of the Bill to stop defendants using the right to silence to escape justice.

The clause has been attacked by Opposition parties and civil liberties groups. However, he may be prepared to compromise to overcome the objections of judges.

As currently drafted, in cases where defendants have signalled that they will not offer evidence at trial, clause 28 would require judges to call upon them to do so. Refusal to go into the witness box would risk the court or the jury drawing adverse inferences.

Lord Taylor of Gosforth, the Lord Chief Justice, led protests against the proposal by senior judges, who wanted a discretionary power. Home Office sources have indicated that the requirement in the Bill could be changed, so that clerks would have the task of calling witnesses to offer evidence.

Speculation that Mr Howard was prepared to abandon clause 28 was fuelled by a U-turn on the Police and Magistrates' Courts Bill in the Lords over the appointment of chairmen of new police authorities.

The Government rejected attempts by the Opposition to remove clause 28 from the Bill in the committee stage, but is preparing the ground for a tougher struggle when it goes through the House of Lords.

The Tory Bow Group last night demanded an end to the early release of criminals.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in