Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

How DWP rhetoric on responsibility for benefit claimants' deaths has subtly shifted

The Department for Work and Pensions has always denied it is possible to in any way connect benefit claimants' deaths with cuts or sanctions

Siobhan Fenton
Saturday 21 May 2016 15:27 BST
Comments
The MP withdrew from the Conservative leadership race last week after conceding he did not have adequate support from other MPs within the party
The MP withdrew from the Conservative leadership race last week after conceding he did not have adequate support from other MPs within the party (Rex)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tensions between the Department for Work and Pensions and anti-austerity campaigners have been high throughout the Conservatives’ time in office. First under Iain Duncan Smith and now under Stephen Crabb, there have been continued allegations from campaigners that benefits cuts are resulting in deaths.

The DWP have always strenuously denied any connection whatsoever between benefit claimants’ suicides and cuts. However, one word might have just signalled that is about to change.

As Disability News Service reports, the language with which DWP have responded to recent allegations has altered in recent weeks. Responding to the recent release of ‘peer reviews’ into the deaths of benefit claimants which have occurred shortly after sanctioning, the DWP said: “Any suicide is tragedy and the reasons for them are complex, however it would be inaccurate and misleading to link it solely to a person’s benefit claim.” The word “solely” appears to be a departure from the tone of previous statements.

By comparison, previous denials have been phrased: “Suicide is a tragic and complex issue, so to link a death to someone’s benefit claim is misleading” as recently as February of this year. Similarly a November 2015 case drew the response that it was: “misleading to link a death to someone’s benefit claim.”

The DWP’s rhetoric appears to be shifting from denial that cuts have any link to deaths to stating that cuts are not the “sole” reason for deaths.

When approached by The Independent for comment on the issue for this article, a spokesperson for the Department for Work and Pensions again said: “Peer reviews help staff to continually improve how they deal with some of the most complex challenging cases, and represent a very small percentage of the benefit claims DWP handles.

“We provide guidance to staff on how best to support vulnerable claimants. Any suicide is a tragedy and the reasons for them are complex, however it would be inaccurate and misleading to link it solely [emphasis added] to a person’s benefit claim.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in