Homes for asylum-seekers present new crisis for G4S
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Hundreds of asylum-seekers face uncertain futures because the security company G4S is having trouble finding accommodation for them.
The giant company, which is struggling to repair the damage its reputation suffered in the run-up to the Olympics, won a contract in June to house asylum-seekers in the north of England, a job previously carried out by social landlords.
G4S's sub-contractors have until 2 November to find new homes for 1,200 asylum-seekers now being housed by councils in Yorkshire and Humberside. They had been expected to start moving in June, but most are still living in council accommodation.
In Kirklees, just one family out of 260 housed by the council has been moved so far. The council has extended its contract with G4S from September to October as a result of the difficulties. "We understand that the sub-contractors are finding it difficult to procure accommodation and the council has been asked to continue to provide assistance until the end of October," a council spokesman told the magazine Inside Housing.
The problem is believed to have been caused in part by a dispute between G4S and a sub-contractor, United Property Management, over "contractual issues". UPM, which had its own properties, was replaced by two new sub-contractors, which have not yet found enough homes in the Yorkshire area.
Deborah Harris, the chief operating officer at the Refugee Council, said: "We are worried by the delays caused by changing housing providers in the area, which have meant people are not being moved within the expected timeframes."
Ismah Naseem, an advice worker at the charity Northern Refugee Centre, told Inside Housing that she feared the problems could lead to a drop in the standard of accommodation for asylum seekers and their families.
But a G4S spokesman said the company was being "very careful" about the properties it selected, and would manage to rehouse all the asylum-seekers before the deadline passed.
G4S was one of three companies awarded contracts earlier this year by the UK Border Agency. In all, the agency expects the contracts to save £150m. An agency spokesman said: "Where people do need to move, proper consideration will be given to any special requirements to ensure minimum disruption."
The largest employer listed on the London Stock Exchange, with more than 650,000 staff worldwide, G4S hit the headlines early in July when it was forced to admit that it was not going to be able to provide the 10,400 contracted guards for the Olympics. More than 18,000 military personnel had to be brought it to fill the gap.
The fiasco is believed to have caused the company a £50m loss on the £284m contract. Nick Buckles, G4S's £1.2m-a-year chief executive, admitted to MPs that the contract had been a "humiliating shambles".
The UK Border Agency hopes to save £150m by contracting out the housing of asylum-seekers
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments