Hitch in drive to curb cost of job cuts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PLANS to keep down the redundancy costs of the shake-up of local government have been thrown off-course by a Local Government Staff Commission recommendation that is 30 per cent higher than ministers want to pay.
Confrontation is also looming with the TUC and local government unions, which are seeking an even more generous package because of the likelihood of long-term unemployment for former public service workers.
Many thousands of jobs could go under the plans to re- organise the two-tier system in English counties into slimmer unitary authorities.
The Local Government Staff Commission (England) is pressing Tony Baldry, junior environment minister, for an upper lump sum limit of 82 weeks' pay. Ministers are known to favour a 66-week maximum.
The commission, set up to advise the Government on staff affected by reorganisation, has told ministers that because employees in the 45-50 age group would not have access to pensions, the maximum payment should reflect the 30-week limit under redundancy legislation plus a year's pay.
The TUC and local government unions want a 104-week minimum that acknowledges that many of those who lose public services jobs are likely to remain without work for long periods. They have highlighted the much more generous civil service maximum payment of 156 weeks.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments