Heathrow expansion abandoned by government as Boris Johnson spokesman says it will not appeal court ruling
Judgment set to give prime minister – and avowed opponent – a convenient exit route from the scheme
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Heathrow expansion looks doomed after the government announced it would not challenge a devastating court ruling against the controversial project.
The judgment – that the third runway is “unlawful” by failing to take into account the UK’s climate change commitments – now looks likely to give Boris Johnson a convenient exit route from the scheme.
Asked whether it was the government’s intention to appeal against the decision, the prime minister’s spokesman replied: “It is not.”
Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, failed to set out a plan B, insisting ministers still wanted “overall airport expansion” – while arguing it was also “absolutely determined” to hit carbon emission commitments.
However, the saga is not over, because Heathrow airport announced it would mount an appeal – despite not being a party to the Court of Appeal case.
“We will appeal to the Supreme Court on this one issue and are confident that we will be successful. In the meantime, we are ready to work with the government to fix the issue that the court has raised,” a spokesperson said.
No 10’s decision confirms suspicions that Mr Johnson – who once vowed to “lie down” in front of bulldozers to stop a third runway – could use a defeat to abandon expansion altogether.
In recent weeks, he had suggested the project would be stopped by the courts, telling MPs this month: “I see no bulldozers at present and no immediate prospect of them arriving.”
And he is known to rage at criticism that he fails to stick to his promises – and be conscious that diggers moving into Heathrow would be the ultimate symbol of a broken pledge.
Friends of the Earth hailed the ruling as “an absolutely groundbreaking result for climate justice”, adding: “We were fighting a project that would have had dire implications for present and future generations.
And Greenpeace predicted defeat for Heathrow’s appeal, saying: “The third runway is already on its knees over costs, noise, air pollution, habitat loss and lack of access, and now Heathrow Ltd has yet another impossibly high hurdle to clear.”
The landmark decision is first time any government has been held to account over the Paris Accord, said Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh, assistant professor of public international law at Leiden University, in the Netherlands.
The court said that in future, a third runway at Heathrow could go ahead – but only if it fitted with the UK’s commitment under the Paris Agreement, which seeks to limit global heating.
The judges found that the government had not followed that policy when backing the expansion plans two years ago.
It was “legally fatal” to Heathrow expansion that it did not take those climate commitments into account, they said.
That raises huge questions over trying to expand another airport, such as Gatwick or Birmingham – and has implications for all huge infrastructure projects.
Mr Shapps tweeted: “Airport expansion is core to boosting global connectivity. We also take seriously our commitment to the environment.
“This govt won’t appeal today’s judgment given our manifesto makes clear any Heathrow expansion will be industry led.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments