Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Heathrow airport expansion 'on track' despite MPs' warning of environmental damage, says Transport Secretary

Call by Commons transport select committee to slam the brakes on third runway plans without tough new restrictions on costs, pollution, aircraft noise and night flights

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Friday 23 March 2018 10:15 GMT
Comments
Chris Grayling: Heathrow airport expansion 'on track' despite MPs' warning of environmental damage

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Transport Secretary has brushed off a fresh warning from MPs of huge environmental damage from building a third runway at Heathrow, insisting the expansion is “on track”.

Chris Grayling said Parliament would be asked to approve the £14bn project in a crucial vote this summer, with construction to start around 2020 after detailed design work.

“This is a project that’s on track,” Mr Grayling said, adding: “This is a really important project for us in the post-Brexit world.”

The pledge came despite a call by the all-party Commons transport select committee to slam the brakes on the expansion without tough new restrictions on costs, pollution, aircraft noise and night flights.

In a stinging report, the committee demanded stronger safeguards to protect local residents and airport passengers before the plans are approved.

The Government’s national policy statement (NPS) – the planning consent needed to pave the way for the two-mile runway – should only be passed if the new environmental conditions were imposed.

Approval should also only be granted if Heathrow can guarantee not to worsen air quality in west London, or increase the number of polluting cars being driven to the airport.

The proposed existing six-and-a-half-hour ban on night flights should be extended to seven hours, the MPs said – and they demanded clarity on changes to rail and road links, particularly the M25.

Without these safeguards, there was a risk that anti-Heathrow groups would successfully block the project through the courts, the committee warned.

“They need to provide some assurance for local communities around air quality, around noise, around potential traffic congestion,” said Lillian Greenwood, the committee’s chair.

“Also, they need to protect passengers from spiralling costs and make sure that airport charges can be held at the current level.”

The report comes amid reports that some senior Labour figures are debating whether to shift the party’s stance against a third runway, because of the environmental damage.

John McDonnell, the Shadow Chancellor – whose west London constituency lies under the Heathrow flightpath – is a long-time opponent of expansion.

On the Conservative side, Boris Johnson once vowed to lie down “in front of those bulldozers and stop the building, stop the construction of that third runway” – a promise apparently now abandoned.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Grayling said MPs would vote before the summer recess on whether to give the outline planning consent.

He dismissed concerns about the M25, arguing the detailed design work to follow would determine whether the new runway would pass over it, or be placed in a tunnel.

“We are moving ahead to the timetable we set when we brought forward our recommendation a year ago,” Mr Grayling said.

Pointing to the aim to strike post-Brexit trade deals around the world, he added: “This is a project we should be excited about. This is a project that is really important for the future of the country.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in