Handover of Falklands 'should be encouraged'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Internal links
Britain considered surrendering sovereignty of the Falkland Islands to Argentina 14 years before the countries went to war in 1982, documents released today reveal.
Lord Chalfont, who was a junior Foreign Office minister in Harold Wilson's Labour government in 1968, said the islanders would have no economic future without closer co-operation with Argentina.
The peer had visited Port Stanley where he told the ruling council: "We have never and do not regard the Argentine claim [of sovereignty] as a valid one." But in a Foreign Office memorandum, released by the Public Record Office, he wrote: "I believe the Falkland Islanders may one day be prepared to choose Argentine sovereignty ... We must show the islanders the advantages to be derived from closer association with Argentina, leading gradually but inexorably to the acceptance of Argentine sovereignty."
The peer, who described the islanders as "unsophisticated", also wrote that Britain would no longer be able to "provide any continuous form of defence of the Falkland Islands against external attack".
The Foreign Office eventually decided not to proceed with the handover, because of opposition within the Cabinet.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments