Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Hamilton heads for safety of the bunker

Ros Wynne-Jones
Saturday 22 March 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The bowling green behind the Tatton Conservative Association in Knutsford was empty yesterday, the office doors battened against the slings and arrows of angry constituents and waiting journalists.

But last night, below ground in a bunker-like meeting room, the party faithful were rallying round Neil Hamilton.

The Cheshire MP was in fighting form - veering between a barrage of humorous insults against his tormentors, the Guardian and Mohamed al Fayed, and a robust defence of his personal integrity.

"I never took any money from Mr Fayed and that comes out unambiguously in the inquiry," he said quietly. But the shaking of his hands as he pointed to highlighted paragraphs of the disputed transcript belied the conviction in his voice.

Mr Hamilton said the "cornerstone" of the allegations made against him two-and-a- half years ago at the outset of the "cash-for-questions saga" as he refers to it, had been disproved the day before in the Standards Committee report which exonerated 15 high-profile ministers from accepting money from Mr Fayed. "This is exactly the same money that Mr Greer [the lobbyist Ian Greer] was supposed to have given to me," he said. "He can't have given it to us both. One of the reasons I suggest that they print the full transcript of the evidence of Mr Fayed, a full transcript of which I've got here, is that it will reveal the allegations are made up." Mr Hamilton denied he was at any risk of deselection at the constituency's annual meeting last night, and he had a message for disloyal constituents.

"There are people in this country who believe that because something appears in a newspaper in this country it must be true. My experience in the past two years is precisely the reverse.

"I would just say to those who privately think it would be better for me to stand down ... what has happened to one of the cardinal principles of this country, that a man is innocent until proven guilty?"

The early signs last night were that Mr Hamilton would weather the deselection crisis ahead.

A local party insider said: "Frankly, we have considered getting rid of Neil and we could easily do so without affecting our chances of winning the seat.

"We could put almost anyone up ... it's a standing joke in Tatton that we could put up a monkey in a blue jacket in these parts and still win. The point is that we don't want to - we'd rather have Neil. We've watched him being crucified over the last two years and, to be honest, most of us feel sorry for the man."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in