Michelle Donelan apologises for making Hamas damages claim on social media
The Science Secretary also told the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee that civil servants cleared her approach.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Michelle Donelan has apologised for publicly posting a letter on social media falsely suggesting an academic had expressed sympathy for Hamas.
The Science Secretary later retracted her comments about Professor Kate Sang and agreed to pay her Ā£15,000 in taxpayer money.
She accepted there was āno evidenceā the academic,Ā who had recently been appointed to the UK Research and Innovationās (UKRI) advisory group on equality, diversity and inclusion, was a Hamas supporter.
Speaking at the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee on Tuesday, Ms Donelan said she should have privately written to UKRI raising her alleged concerns, instead of posting the letter on X, formerly Twitter.
She also said that civil servants were aware that she was going to publish her letter on the platform.
Ms Donelan told the committee: āWhile I always err on the side of transparency, I am now clear that in this case, I could have sent the letter in confidence to the UKRI in order for them to undertake the investigations privately.
āAnd I do apologise for not having done so, and for any distraction that this decision has caused from this Governmentās positive agenda.ā
She added: āI highlighted it on the platform that the original tweet was done on ā Twitter, or X ā and that was something I have apologised for.
āWith hindsight, I could have just sent it privately and if I had the ability to do it again, I would certainly just send it privately.
āSo Iāve said that publicly as well as retracting the original comments, which I do think is important.
āIn terms of advice, of course, with long-time precedent, we donāt get into the actual nature of the advice.
āBut what I can tell you here today, is that both policy and legal were not only cited but also cleared the approach taken.ā
The letter written by Ms Donelan expressed ādisgust and outrageā that Prof Sang and another academic, Dr Kamna Patel, had āshared extremist viewsā and, in Prof Sangās case, expressed sympathy for the terrorist group after the October 7 attacks in Israel.
This followed a tweet by Prof Sang saying: āThis is disturbing. Suella Braverman urges police to crack down on Hamas support in UKā with a link to an article by the Guardian describing the response to the Hamas attacks in the UK.
Ms Donelan has since accepted that Prof Sangās comments referred to the story as a whole, and not just the headline.
The Science Secretary told the committee she is a champion of academic freedom of speech and that the incident had to be viewed in the context of the recent Hamas attack at the time.
Ms Donelan continued: āAnd we have seen a great deal of hatred across online social media platforms ā something that I had addressed directly with the platforms themselves ā and we were very worried about potential violence on our own streets.ā
She also told the peers: āMy actions were never motivated by any political desire.
āThey were motivated by a concern around whether proper process and due diligence had been followed.
āAnd as I outlined at the very beginning, in my initial statement, the specific tweet, or X, that I saw I felt was concerning especially given the context at the time, and that is why I highlighted it for an investigation by UKRI.ā
Ms Donelan also explained that there is āno surveillance at allā of academics and she had been alerted to the initial tweet by an official within the department.
Asked how the damage caused by the incident can be repaired, the Science Secretary said there would be an āinternal review of processes to ensure that we learnt the lessons of this and that we donāt ever repeat thoseā.
Responding to the apology, Peter Kyle, Labourās shadow science secretary, said: āRishi Sunak said he would lead a government of integrity, but this squalid episode shows he has once again utterly failed on that promise.
āDonelan has now admitted that there was no need to publicly hurl abuse at an academic without evidence.
āItās an insult to hardworking families up and down the country that Ā£15,000 of taxpayer money was wasted on unprofessional and libellous behaviour from a Conservative Cabinet minister.
āMichelle Donelan has not been able to show that she still has the support of our vital scientific community.
āLabour has been clear, Donelan still needs to answer whether civil servants helped to produce a dossier on the academic, and she must inform the public of the overall legal fees paid by the taxpayer.ā