Government should stop inventing new crimes, says justice minister Simon Hughes
Mr Hughes has called for prudence over introducing new criminal offences
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Cabinet members have received an "urgent plea" to stop clogging up the statute book with unnecessary new criminal offences.
The Justice minister Simon Hughes is worried that it is hard to keep track of what offences exist when similar crimes are spread across several laws. For example, if the Government wants to stop prisoners carrying certain items it would typically create a new law, when existing legislation banning phones could be amended.
Mr Hughes sent every Secretary of State a letter last week calling for prudence over introducing new criminal offences. At the end of this year Mr Hughes will publish figures on the number of new criminal offences that have been introduced in this Parliament, as well as those that have been removed or amended.
Mr Hughes said: "I wouldn't be surprised in the first year of using this comprehensive methodology if there is a net increase in offences across the UK since 2010."
A Whitehall source added: "This letter could be described as an 'urgent plea': let's try and keep the statute book as simple as possible."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments