Government resists call for change in abortion law
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Changes to the abortion laws remain a matter of conscience, John Reid, the Health Secretary, said yesterday after the architect of the 1967 Abortion Act called for a drastic tightening of the legal limit on terminations.
Lord Steel of Aikwood said that abortions for non-medical reasons should be banned after 12 weeks because of advances in technology. The current limit is 24 weeks.
The former Liberal leader told Scotland on Sunday: "If it's simply the decision of the mother then the limit should be 12 weeks. I personally believe it's likely to happen.
"When we introduced the Act it was always the intention that the operation should be carried out as early as possible. Advances in medical technology mean that a large number of problems and abnormalities are now detectable at an earlier stage than they were in previous years. Also, a foetus can survive at an earlier stage than it could in the past."
Mr Reid, who has backed a ban on abortions after 18 weeks, said a change in the law was a matter of conscience for Parliament, and not for ministers to decide. He told the BBC's Breakfast with Frost: "I want to make it clear that this is always a decision for Parliament. It is a conscience decision, in the sense that people are allowed to vote freely according to their own conscience. It is not government sponsored.
"Roughly once every five or six years there is a debate on this. It is not up to me as a minister to decide, this is up to Parliament to decide."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments