Government at risk of breaking its own welfare spending cap
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government has been warned that it may breach its self-imposed cap on welfare spending because it is failing in its drive to reduce the cost of the main benefit for the sick and disabled.
Leaked documents say that the cost of Employment Support Allowance (ESA) is projected to rise to £13.3bn by the 2018-19 financial year and is "one of the largest fiscal risks currently facing the government".
Reports passed to the BBC suggest the Government is “vulnerable to a breach” of the £119.5bn cap on welfare spending in 2015-16 previously trumpeted by George Osborne. Ministers would either have to cut spending or make a statement to Parliament explaining their failure. The documents warn that further cuts would be controversial, saying that the “low-hanging fruit” has already been picked.
Ministers had hoped that more regular “fitness for work” tests would reduce the bill. But reports say that people are remaining on ESA for longer than expected because their illness and disability has been underestimated. Claimants are moving off Jobseeker's Allowance and on to ESA, which has fewer sanctions. There have also been problems with the private firm Atos, which is withdrawing from its contract to carry out health assessments.
Public spending watchdogs have attacked the launch of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for the disabled as a “fiasco”.
Rachel Reeves, the shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, said the work capability assessment was "in meltdown” and urged David Cameron to “get a grip” of the “chaotic” Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). "It is a catalogue of total failure and threatens huge costs to the taxpayer," she said.
The Treasury insisted that delivery of ESA was "back on track" and said it was "confident" of remaining within the cap, which excludes the state pension and some jobless benefits. A DWP spokesman said the spending projections were "spurious scenarios" based on no action being taken. "We've taken action and will ensure we do not breach the welfare cap. Speculation to the contrary is nonsense," he said.
The DWP pointed to figures showing that one million claimants of Incapacity Benefit - which is being replaced by the ESA - have been classed as fit for work. It said there are now 160,000 fewer people claiming sickness benefits than in 2010, with 700,000 more people looking or preparing for work.
But Dame Anne Begg, the Labour chairman of the Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee, said ministers appeared to have "believed their own rhetoric" about large numbers of claimants being fit for work.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments