Government ‘actively considering’ watering down celebrities’ ability to obtain court injunctions
It comes after a 'well-known' public figure took out a court injunction to prevent the UK media from publishing details of an extra-marital 'three-way sexual encounter'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Government ministers are “actively considering” plans to water down celebrities’ ability to prevent the British media from publishing material through court injunctions, according to reports.
It comes after a “well-known” public figure took out an injunction to prevent the Sun on Sunday from publishing details of an extra-marital “three-way sexual encounter” and details of an “open” marriage with their partner.
The individual is referred to by the initials PJS and their partner is referred to as YMA in the case. The couple’s identity, however, was revealed in American publications and circulated on social media. The Sun on Sunday had wanted to publish an account of their “sexual exploits” with others.
Conservative MP Philip Davies condemned the injunction and said that the situation is a “farce” and has made an “ass out of the law” in the UK.
But speaking to the Sunday Telegraph, a Whitehall source said: “It’s an issue which has been under active consideration,”
According to the newspaper the source said the government was looking to re-balance the law so injunctions are more difficult to obtain using “right to private life” claims under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice said to The Independent the department "does not comment on stories from unnamed sources".
“The principal issue in this appeal is whether the first instance judge, who refused to grant an injunction, properly balanced the competing rights which are in play,” wrote Lord Justice Jackson in his ruling regarding the “well-known” public figure.
Justice Jackson said he and Lady Justice King had decided to allow their appeal after balancing their human right to respect for family life and the newspaper's right to free expression.
Lord Justice Jackson said publishing the story would be “devastating” for the claimant under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and would “generate a media storm” – saying the couple's two children would become the subject of increased press attention.
Lord Justice Jackson said both PJS and YMA had been in an "open" relationship but were committed to each other and their children.
“They maintained that they had not courted publicity about their private life. They said that the various press articles about them were substantially true. They had been in a relationship for many years. The relationship was an open one.
“YMA accepted that from time to time the claimant had sexual encounters with others. The relationship between the claimant and YMA was one of commitment. They provided a loving home for their children.”