Fury at plan for access to medical records
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans to allow government access to medical records without patients' permission descended into chaos yesterday as a sitting of the committee set up to pass the new legal regulations was suspended.
Plans to allow government access to medical records without patients' permission descended into chaos yesterday as a sitting of the committee set up to pass the new legal regulations was suspended.
The delay came after protests from opposition MPs that they had not been given the correct papers to allow them to scrutinise plans to allow access to confidential details in medical files.
The Tories accused the Government of seeking to undermine the patient-doctor relationship and compromise confidentiality. They warned that people would be reluctant to have HIV tests if they knew that details could be passed to government employees. They will try force a vote in the House of Lords next week to block the new measures.
Liam Fox, the shadow Health Secretary, said: "Today is the death of confidentiality as we know it. Information about ourselves is now effectively owned by the state."
The plans – under which doctors who refuse to hand over patients' files could be fined – were condemned by patients' representatives as "evil".
The measures would allow files to be obtained by researchers, health professionals, or "persons employed or engaged by a government department" to monitor reactions to vaccines and medicines. The Government said the measures were designed to obtain information in the event of an epidemic. There were "no plans for civil servants to obtain people's medical records".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments