Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Freemasons 'should tell of allegiance'

Patricia Wynn Davies
Friday 04 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FREEMASONS occupying positions in public life should declare their allegiance,the Prime Minister said yesterday.

Mr Major said that was his personal view after Chris Mullin, the Labour MP for Sunderland South, reminded him during Prime Minister's Questions that in September 1986 in a questionnaire from Martin Short (author of Inside the Brotherhood), he had agreed that police officers, magistrates, members of Parliament, councillors and other public officials who were freemasons should disclose their membership.

'Is that still his position?' Mr Mullin asked, urging the Prime Minister to support his private-member Secret Societies (Declaration) Bill due for its Commons Second Reading on 29 January.

Mr Major replied: 'It remains my personal view as I set out at that time.' He would examine Mr Mullin's Bill and his own timetable and 'see what answer I come up with'.

The Bill does not seek to stop grown men wearing aprons, baring their breasts or indulging in other rituals but would sweep away the secrecy attaching to membership.

A wide range of public institutions - including the Commons, health authorities, government departments, local councils, police authorities, NHS trusts and urban development corporations - would be under a duty to keep a register, open to public inspection, of officer-holders or candidates for appointment who are members of 'secret societies'. Anyone failing to register membership would be liable to a fine.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in