Foreign Office official knew of Kelly rumours
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Office rumours that David Kelly was Andrew Gilligan's secret source were circulating weeks before the weapons expert's name became public, Lord Hutton's inquiry was told yesterday. John Williams press secretary at the Foreign Office, said Dr Kelly had been mooted by colleagues as the contact in June.
On 7 July Alastair Campbell announced at a Downing Street meeting that a suspected source had come forward. The next day, Mr Williams fielded a barrage of calls from newspapers.
"The reason they were ringing me was they were under the impression that it was a Foreign Office official they were looking for," he said. "I said: 'It's not a Foreign Office official and I can't help you'." He explained that although he knew Dr Kelly's identity by that stage, it was not for him to go public. "It was being dealt with internally from the MoD."
Mr Williams, a former political editor of the Daily Mirror, told the the inquiry he had been asked to imagine he was an "extremely hostile and sceptical journalist" during the preparation of the September dossier, subjecting its contents to critical analysis. "In other words I was asked to sex it down," he said.
Mr Williams said there was a simple explanation for the apparent insertion of the 45-minute claim into the dossier. "The point is that if it was assessed as credible on September 9th ... That is how it got into the dossier."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments