Foreign Office condemned by MPs for putting trade deals above human rights
Report also accuses George Osborne of attempting to foces through 'beyond irresponsible' cuts to diplomatic spending
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Foreign Office will be condemned by MPs for allowing human rights to slip behind winning trade deals in its order of priorities.
The Independent disclosed this month that Sir Simon McDonald, the department’s Permanent Secretary, had conceded that human rights no longer enjoyed the same “profile” within the Foreign Office as “in the past”.
His admission when he appeared before the Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee provoked anger among civil liberties groups.
In a new report, the committee says it is disturbed by his comments and demands a change of approach by the Government. The MPs blame the downgrading of human rights on the savings already imposed on the department and say the committee believes that “human rights should be re-established as a top priority”.
It also accuses the Chancellor, George Osborne, of attempting to force through “beyond irresponsible” cuts to diplomatic spending at a time of growing international instability.
The Foreign Secretary, Philip Hammond, is resisting pressure from the Chancellor to shave hundreds of millions of pounds from his budget. He receives influential support in the committee’s report, which calls for an increase rather than cuts to his budget.
It contrasts Mr Osborne’s treatment of the Foreign Office with his approach to the Ministry of Defence and the Department for International Development, whose budgets are to be protected. The MPs conclude that it is “beyond irresponsible to treat Foreign Office expenditure as the only unprotected department in this group”.
Its chairman, the former Tory minister Crispin Blunt, said: “We are living in an increasingly unstable world and the Government relies on the Foreign Office to have the necessary infrastructure in place so it can make critical decisions at a moment’s notice. We cannot recall a more complex and challenging ... environment in recent decades, and the Foreign Office needs to have the diplomatic and analytical capability to reassert its leading role.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments