Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ex-policy chief blunts Blair's counter-attack

John Rentoul
Friday 02 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

JOHN RENTOUL

Political Correspondent

Tony Blair, the Labour leader, launched a fierce counter-attack against Conservative charges of hypocrisy yesterday, as the party's former policy director issued a call for Labour to be more open about the need for more public borrowing.

Speaking to a meeting of party members for the first time since the row over Harriet Harman's decision to send her son to a selective school, Mr Blair took on the Tory taunt that Labour "says one thing and does another".

Referring to the Tory record on tax, crime, the health service and home ownership, he said: "They say one thing before an election - and they do another afterwards."

But his attack was blunted by a prediction from Roland Wales, who resigned as Labour director of policy just before Christmas, that, "sooner rather than later", a Labour government would have to "explain its case for higher borrowing".

Mr Wales's article in today's New Statesman was given added prominence when it was rubbished by a Labour spokesman. "He had no input whatsoever into policy-making and, even if he wanted them to be, his views were not taken seriously," the spokesman said.

Mr Wales, a former high- flying Bank of England official, hired by the former Labour leader, the late John Smith, writes: "Voters want more and better jobs, better schools and better health and housing. Awaiting the fruits of growth is unlikely to be enough; a Labour chancellor will have to find the funds to start making good the chronic public sector-investment gap, while calming the fears of the markets."

Mr Wales told the Independent yesterday: "People should be aware of the size of the task in order to massage down expectations."

Denying that his article was disloyal, he said: "It was designed to say that we have the potential to move towards a more sensible approach to public borrowing, but haven't yet devised proper controls." He advocates excluding public corporations - such as the Post Office and railways - from public-sector borrowing.

Mr Wales did not give reasons for leaving his job, although Labour policy is increasingly determined in Mr Blair's office, under his head of policy, David Miliband. Mr Wales was replaced last month, after a fierce struggle between the Labour leader and his deputy John Prescott, by Matthew Taylor, Mr Blair's favoured candidate.

Mr Blair, meanwhile, speaking in Brentford, west London, warned the Tories against fighting a dirty campaign. "Do the Tories really want to be judged on which party has the biggest liars or the biggest hypocrites? They would be wise not to.

"They made their promises. They broke them. And behind every one broken promise lie thousands, millions of wrecked lives. The people who dreamt of owning their own home, then watched as it was repossessed. The people who felt safe in their job, then helpless as it was taken away from them."

He portrayed a "nightmare" scenario of a fifth Tory term: "Will you be paying to see a doctor? Will your child be taught in a class of 100? Will you all be trapped in negative equity? Will you all need private security for your street, your home, your office?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in