Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Expenses watchdog defends £6.6m set-up costs

Press Association
Thursday 11 February 2010 11:43 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The new MPs expenses watchdog today defended its £6.6 million set-up costs and insisted the annual bill to taxpayers would be lower in future.

A new London headquarters and IT equipment were included in the initial budget, a spokesman for the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority said.

Next year's budget is yet to be finalised as the details of IPSA's operations remain under consideration.

But officials said they believed it would show a reduction on the staff costs of the House of Commons Fees Office, which it is replacing.

"The estimated cost of setting up IPSA in 2009/10 is £6.6 million. This figure was published to Parliament last year and reflects one-off costs of establishing a new, independent public body of this sort, such as the acquisition of accommodation and IT systems," a spokesman said.

"Early estimates suggest that in direct staff costs, the team working directly on the expenses system within IPSA will cost less than the existing House of Commons arrangements."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in