Evidence in honours inquiry 'not revealed' 'hidden' in probe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The "most significant" evidence discovered by police during the cash-for-honours inquiry has not been revealed to the public, according to an official report by one of the senior investigators in the case.
The mysterious claim, which emerged last night, comes days after police disclosed that they had spent £1.4m of public money over a period of 19 months on the inquiry, which resulted in no charges being brought.
Assistant Commissioner John Yates has come in for criticism from Labour MPs for spending so long pursuing politicians over whether or not money was leant to political parties in exchange for peerages.
But the report, leaked to the Press Association last night after it was delivered to the Metropolitan Police Authority, defends the investigation as "focused and proportionate", and discloses that police requested a "forensic image" of Downing Street's computer system.
In November last year, Mr Yates fuelled speculation that he was in possession of critical evidence when he told Tony Wright, the Chairman of the Public Administration Select Committee, that "significant and valuable material" had been obtained. The new claim is likely to fuel speculation that such material remains outside the public domain.
The report also criticises the Electoral Commission for failing to provide "robust oversight" over the definition of a commercial loan.
A Met spokeswoman last night confirmed that the report had been delivered but declined to add any other comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments