Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: EU withdrawal bill debate delayed after 300 amendments demanded by MPs

Cabinet minister Andrea Leadsom said MPs' proposed changes are being reviewed by officials 

Joe Watts
Political Editor
Friday 13 October 2017 08:47 BST
Comments
Andream Leadsom mentions some 300 amendments demanded by MPS for EU withdrawal

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government’s key piece of Brexit legislation has been delayed due to a major push from MPs to force changes to it.

The EU withdrawal Bill will now not be debated next week after some 300 amendments were demanded by MPs, with many of them thought to enjoy enough support among Conservative MPs.

If Theresa May were to suffer a defeat at the hands of Labour and Tory rebels on her critical piece of Brexit legislation it would once again call into question the credibility of her administration.

Theresa May caught in Brexit trap after EU leaders block future trade talks

It came after the EU’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier warned of a “disturbing” deadlock in Brexit negotiations, with Ms May facing pressure to make further concessions to move talks on to future trade.

Leader of the House Andrea Leadsom confirmed that the Government was not yet ready to take its Brexit Bill before the House of Commons.

She said that as well as the 300 amendments, some 54 new clauses have also been proposed by MPs who have concerns.

Around 13 are thought to have enough support from Tories to see the Government defeated in a Commons vote, with ex-attorney general Dominic Grieve leading a drive to tighten up the legislation’s language.

Ms Leadsom told MPs: “Those proposals are being closely evaluated.

“That is taking a bit of time so that we give proper, thoughtful, well considered responses to them. We will, of course, be bringing forward the Committee of the whole House just as soon as we are able to do so.”

Labour seized on the delay calling for Ms May to change the Bill, claiming it was not going before the Commons next week because the Government was afraid pro-Europe Tory rebels would back amendments to it.

Shadow Brexit Secretary Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC: “The Tories' Repeal Bill is simply not fit for purpose.

“It would give huge and unaccountable power to ministers and puts vital rights and protections at risk.

“Theresa May must start listening to the legitimate concerns of Labour and some of her own MPs by urgently changing approach.”

Ms May is caught in a Brexit trap after EU leaders ruled Britain must pay up to secure future trade talks, while her own MPs demanded she make no more concessions.

Barnier: The Brexit agreement will not be based on concessions

The heads of the EU states agreed the UK had not made “sufficient progress” on the withdrawal divorce terms, according to a leaked statement drafted by Donald Tusk, the President of the European Council, just hours after confirmation that the talks are deadlocked.

They backed the EU’s chief negotiator Mr Barnier, after he said negotiations over future trade with Britain would be blocked until Ms May gave ground on paying the UK’s Brexit “divorce” bill and guaranteeing citizens’ rights.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in