Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Macintyre's Sketch: Fawning in the Commons, doghouse at home

 

Donald Macintyre
Tuesday 19 November 2013 02:57 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In an admittedly competitive field, the award for the most unctuous Commons question on the Commonwealth Summit should probably go to the Tory backbencher Michael Ellis.

Did David Cameron know he had been described “in the Australian press as a defender of democratic ideals and a confident international statesman?”

And hadn’t he been right to go, not least because the “concomitant publicity” secured by his visit to Jaffna had so ably highlighted human rights issues in Sri Lanka? Since Cameron had been saying exactly that, throughout the previous 53 minutes of exchanges, this was not exactly challenging.

Ellis might as well have asked whether “my Right Honourable friend agrees with himself?” But Cameron’s answer to the first question was both self-deprecating and intriguing. He had been called many things in the past week, and such views “are not all necessarily shared widely in the Cameron household”.

We wondered wildly whether Samantha had joined Labour in arguing on political grounds against her husband going, as she is said to have stiffened his resolve over Syria. But no, it was probably that she needed some help with the shopping.

So this left Miliband somewhat out on his own. It had all started consensually with the Labour leader congratulating the Government on earmarking £50m in aid to the typhoon-stricken Philippines. From there it rather deteriorated into a wrangle over whether the Labour government’s 2009 decision to block Sri Lanka from hosting the two yearly summit until 2013 was a model Cameron should have repeated in 2011, or was iwhat had made last week’s Colombo summit an unbreakable date.

Among MPs, Cameron probably had the better argument. True, he seems now to know more about northern Sri Lanka than north London. First he accused of Miliband of knowing little of abroad and “barely getting out of Islington”.

Then he recalled David Miliband had said that we needed Prime Ministers who could “stop the traffic in Beijing”. Whereas, he told the younger brother: “You won’t even get out of Primrose Hill.” Miliband and his shadow Foreign Secretary Douglas Alexander found something about Cameron’s remarks pretty funny.

But while Labour MPs rightly asked sharp questions few directly challenged his decision to go. Plaid Cymru’s Elfyn Llwyd said he had opposed Cameron’s trip but that having heard his statement had changed his mind. It would have been quite a moment if Miliband had said the same. But in big party politics, U-turns like that break all the rules.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in