Dominic Cummings: How papers reacted to explosive claims at Covid hearing
Frontpages describe ‘rain of fire’ and ‘Domshell’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Explosive revelations by Dominic Cummings about how the govenrment responded to the coronavirus pandemic feature on the front of many of Thursday’s papers.
The former aide’s marathon seven-hour session of evidence to MPs provided plenty of incendiary claims, with some calling it a “rain of fire” and others a “Domshell”.
His comments included suggestions government failings led to tens of thousands of people dying unnecessarily, through to Mr Cummings saying he did not think Mr Johnson was suitable to be prime minister.
The Times features a sketch from Quentin Letts on its front page in which he refers to the session as "longer and bloodier than Hamlet".
He writes: "Mark Sedwill, the former cabinet secretary, took a pyroclastic boulder smack in the face.
"The Department of Health was left smoking like Ground Zero. Carrie Symonds was 'crackers' and 'desperate to get rid of me'.
"Even Dilyn the dog came up in dispatches and may well now have to give evidence to the official Covid inquiry. Only in England could a major health dingdong include a cameo for a Jack Russell. Barking."
The Independent, The i and Daily Mirror all used the same quote headline: "Tens of thousands died who didn't need to die", with the latter carrying a leader column headlined "damning testimony".
The paper points out the problem of only hearing one side of the story, but that the government "failed in this fundamental duty".
It says: "Cummings' evidence may have been onesided and selective but it should not be ignored. His criticisms of the government's handling of Covid demand an explanation.
"The coward Johnson is trying to hide from accountability by delaying the public inquiry into Covid until next spring. We need to learn lessons now, not at his convenience."
The Daily Telegraph took a different angle, suggesting an element of revenge from Mr Cummings, with associate editor Camilla Tominey writing "having expended his nine lives in government, this was also about settling scores".
The Sun's headline - "Do you need a hindsight test, Mr Cummings?" - pokes fun at his well-publicised trip to Barnard Castle during the pandemic, while its leader column claims Mr Johnson will "dodge Dom's bombs".
It adds people "recognise that our government was one of many whose Covid response was found wanting.
"The key difference since being the stellar success of our world-leading vaccine rollout.
"Voters are more likely to credit the government with that and our rosier future than rake over the terrible bleakness of 2020 and the chaos in Downing Street."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments