Docklands' pounds 450m road tunnel 'should not have been built'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.CHRISTIAN WOLMAR
Transport Correspondent
The most expensive road in Britain, a 1.1-mile dual tunnel in east London's Docklands, cost nearly pounds 450m of public money to build, and was constructed despite appearing to have no economic benefit, a National Audit Office report published yesterday reveals.
The Limehouse Link, a tunnel under Limehouse basin opened by the Prime Minister in May 1993, was built by the London Docklands Development Corporation as part of the regeneration of the area. The construction costs were originally put at pounds 141.5m in 1988. However, the price steadily rose, and by the time tenders were accepted, the LDDC estimated the cost would be pounds 227.6m.
Because of difficult ground conditions, onerous noise restrictions and problems with design, costs rose again to pounds 293.3m. Some problems were a result of "deficiencies in the tender process" and poor management. The contractors were paid pounds 9m just for finishing on time.
In addition to construction, the NAO estimates there were further costs of pounds 155.3m for acquiring the land and rehousing local residents. The final cost of pounds 448.6m is about two-thirds of what BR invests annually.
If the project had been assessed under the normal cost benefit analysis used by the Department of Transport, it would never have been built. When its feasibility was first examined, the cost was estimated to be pounds 91m but even at that price it failed to show positive economic benefit. However, the LDDC pressed ahead because of the supposed regenerative effect of the road.
According to the NAO, the LDDC was under pressure from Olympia and York, developers of Canary Wharf, to build the link as the firm had made clear "their view that a delay in constructing would be unacceptable".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments