David Davis criticises 'discourteous language' from the EU in transition period document
Brexit Secretary says it was 'unwise' for the EU to publish a document outlining possible sanctions should Britain breach terms during the transition period
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Davis has accused the European Union of acting in bad faith and using “discourteous language” in publishing plans that would enable the bloc to sanction the UK during a transition period.
Lashing out the European Commission, the Brexit Secretary said he regarded the legal document from Brussels – published this week – as "unwise" and a “political document”.
The draft text from Brussels said that EU leaders had requested a mechanism to “suspend certain benefits” including “participation in the single market” if the UK breaches the bloc’s laws and regulations during the two-year transition period.
Brexiteers were outraged by the leak of the document, fearing that Britain will become a “vassal state” after formally leaving the EU in March 2019.
But referring to the papers after a crucial meeting of Theresa May’s 11-member Brexit cabinet, Mr Davis said: “This document was hardly a legal document, it was a political document. What we’re about, is building an implementation period, which is to build a bridge to a future where we work well together.
"And I do not think it was in good faith to publish a document with frankly discourteous language, and actually implying that they could arbitrarily terminate, in effect, the implementation period. That’s not what the aim of this exercise, it’s not in good faith, and we think unwise to publish that.”
His intervention, however, comes after Whitehall attempted to play down the significance of the EU text, insisting it would form the basis for a negotiation.
And on Wednesday, Stefaan De Rynck, an adviser to EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier, said sanctions for UK breaches of Brussels rules during the transition “of course” had to be part of any deal.
Mr Davis added that “a lot of things” had been resolved in the Government’s Brexit meeting on Thursday, claiming the atmosphere was “very constructive”.
“I’m not going to give you a detailed blow-by-blow of a cabinet committee - that obviously never happens,” he said.
“Very constructive, a lot of things resolved. Bear in mind we’ve already got a very, very strong framework of what we want to achieve. That is an overarching free trade agreement and large numbers of components of what we want to achieve within that, a customs agreement and so on, and we were fleshing that out. But you’ll hear more about that from the prime minister in due course, I’m sure.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments