Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Greensill: Top civil servant ‘joined firm before quitting’ as PM is warned Cameron inquiry lacks independence

Fresh focus on Greensill influence after procurement chief was made adviser while still a civil servant

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 14 April 2021 01:49 BST
Comments
Matt Hancock quizzed on why he had 'private drink' with David Cameron

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of the country’s most senior civil servants was allowed by the Cabinet Office to work part-time as a director at Greensill Capital while still part of the civil service, it was revealed last night.

Bill Crothers began working for the firm in September 2015 in a board advisory role, but he did not leave his job as chief commercial officer until November that year.

The revelation is likely to embolden critics who say that the investigation into the lobbying fiasco involving the collapsed Greenshill and David Cameron is designed to “kill the issue off” rather than get to the truth.

In a stinging letter, former Tory cabinet minister Eric Pickles, now the head of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, demanded to know why the Cabinet Office had allowed the situation to develop.

“The lack of transparency around this part-time employment with Greensill may have left the misleading impression that Mr Crothers had wilfully ignored the obligation to seek advice,” Lord Pickles told Alex Chisholm, its permanent secretary.

It comes as Boris Johnson has been warned that the Cameron inquiry will not be truly independent and will fail to rebuild shattered public confidence about the power of lobbyists.

The prime minister is facing growing criticism for setting up a probe “run out of the Cabinet Office” that will not address the controversy of access enjoyed by ex-ministers paid huge sums by private firms.

Sir Alistair Graham, a former chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, told The Independent that that inquiry – to be led by the director of a Whitehall department – appeared designed to “kill the issue off”, rather than get to the truth.

And a senior Conservative MP, Bernard Jenkin, echoed the fear that it would ignore the central issue of the “revolving door” between Whitehall and private firms.

“There needs to be some kind of inquiry to address the underlying issues about the way the business-government relationship is managed,” he said.

“For a couple of decades, this has been undermining public confidence,” the chair of the Liaison Committee warned.

Sir Alistair even suggested the prime minister would take the explosive step of scrapping the post of adviser on ministerial standards, vacant since Alex Allen quit in protest at the refusal to sack Priti Patel for bullying her staff.

“I think they just want to quietly ditch the role because it’s too embarrassing for prime ministers. They don’t like the conclusions they come to,” he added.

Nigel Boardman, a high-flying lawyer and business department director, was appointed on Monday to investigate Mr Cameron’s lobbying for Greensill, a collapsed finance firm that employed him.

But the choice has been attacked as “cronyism”, after it emerged Mr Boardman opposed Mr Cameron’s limited curbs to lobbying practices nearly a decade ago.

Downing Street has also admitted he will not have legal powers to gather evidence or examine the behaviour of ministers – including Matt Hancock and Rishi Sunak – who were lobbied privately.

Sir Alistair said: “I don’t think it is truly independent – it is being run out of the Cabinet Office and they are using one of the non-executive directors on their boards.

“You have a feeling that it may have been devised in the way that they hope will kill the issue off and perhaps come up with some minor tweaks to the lobbying rules, but not much else.”

The inquiry should be done by a QC or a judge, someone “totally outside of the government”, he said, and look into “whether ministers behaved properly”.

The chancellor replied to text messages sent by Mr Cameron to say he had “pushed” civil servants to explore how Greensill could be included within the emergency Covid-19 loan scheme.

Mr Hancock, the health secretary, discussed a proposed payment scheme with Mr Cameron and Mr Greensill, which was subsequently introduced by the NHS.

Mr Johnson has dismissed criticism of Mr Boardman’s appointment, insisting he would be given “pretty much carte blanche to ask anybody whatever he needs” to get to the bottom of the controversy.

“I would like it to be done quickly, but wanted him to have the maximum possible access, so we can all understand exactly what’s happened,” he insisted.

Pressed on why it was not “a full independent inquiry”, Mr Johnson replied: “I’ve got every confidence in Nigel.”

On Wednesday, Labour will stage a vote in an attempt to force a parliamentary inquiry into the scandal – held in the open, calling witnesses – but it is certain to be defeated by the huge Conservative majority.

A Cabinet Office spokesman said: "We have responded to the initial letter from Lord Pickles and will respond to his further letter in due course.

"The Boardman review into Greensill Capital and supply chain finance will be wide-ranging and will also consider the issues raised so the public can judge whether they were appropriately handled at the time."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in