Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Greensill: David Cameron texted Rishi Sunak while lobbying for collapsed bank

Labour raises questions about chancellor’s role

Jon Stone
Policy Correspondent
Sunday 21 March 2021 18:51 GMT
Comments
David Cameron has reportedly been lobbying for Greensill Capital
David Cameron has reportedly been lobbying for Greensill Capital (AFP via Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

David Cameron sent several text messages to Rishi Sunak in the course of lobbying for a bank, it has been reported.

The Sunday Times says the former prime minister messaged the chancellor’s private phone about allowing Greensill Capital into a state-backed loan scheme.

The bank has since collapsed and potentially left taxpayers on the hook for millions in underwritten loans.

There is no suggestion that Mr Cameron acted unlawfully and most of his texts reportedly went unanswered.

Labour last night called on Mr Sunak to “set the record straight” amid questions about how he responded to lobbying for Greensill by his Tory colleague.

In a letter to the chancellor, Mr Sunak’s Labour counterpart Anneliese Dodds asked Mr Sunak to explain whether he had personally spoken with the former Tory prime minister during the course of the lobbying.

Read more:

Ms Dodds said the revelations raised “urgent questions about the chancellor’s priorities and decision-making during a pandemic” and demanded the government launch “a full and thorough investigation”.

An investigation by the Financial Times this week revealed that Mr Sunak had stepped in to give Greensill Capital another hearing after Treasury officials decided not to include it in the Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF).

“We need to understand why it appears a bank advised by a former Conservative prime minister was given so much access to the Treasury compared to other Covid loan lenders. These questions are even more serious and urgent given Greensill’s later collapse,” Ms Dodds said.

“The chancellor has a duty to protect the public finances. Taxpayers will rightly want to know if David Cameron played any role in the Treasury’s decision to open government-backed loan schemes to Greensill Capital, putting hundreds of thousands of pounds of their money at risk.

“The chancellor must urgently set the record straight by answering the questions I’ve posed today.”

Mr Cameron’s lobbying efforts have raised further questions about the revolving door between government and the private sector.

As well as clarifying whether he had spoken to his former Tory colleague, Mr Sunak is being asked by Labour to explain the Treasury’s decision-making process, and what steps he had taken in relation to documented concerns about Greensill’s stability.

Ultimately, Greensill was not allowed access to the CCFF, but was, after persistent requests, permitted to issue state-backed loans under the separate Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Loan Scheme.

The loans contributed to taxpayers’ exposure to debts linked to the collapsed banks.

An HM Treasury spokesperson said: “Treasury officials regularly meet with stakeholders to discuss our economic response to Covid.

“The meetings in question were primarily about broadening the scope of CCFF to enable access for providers of supply chain finance, which – following a call for evidence and discussions with several other firms within the sector – we decided against and informed the businesses concerned.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in