Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Critics attack 1,000 bond scheme for foreign relatives who visit UK

Nigel Morris,Home Affairs Correspondent
Wednesday 19 December 2007 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Moves to make families pay bonds of up to 1,000 to sponsor visits by foreign relatives have been condemned as discriminatory.

Ministers, who also intend to halve the length of tourist visas to three months, believe the plan will deter visitors from remaining in the country after their permission to stay runs out.

But senior Labour MPs and immigration groups protested that the size of the bonds imposed on visitors from outside the European Union was excessive.

Keith Vaz, the Labour MP for Leicester East, warned that families staging big weddings could not be expected to afford to put up 20,000 to sponsor the 20 relatives who might be planning to attend.

Mr Vaz, who is chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, said: "I hope the Government will listen to local communities and MPs who have large immigration caseloads."

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants said the charge would indirectly discriminate against ethnic minorities, who would see it as a deliberate obstacle to deter visitors.

Its chief executive, Habib Rahman, added: "It will create hardship for families. This means only people with fat wallets will be able to bring their families."

Liam Byrne, the Immigration Minister, said the financial guarantee would not apply to all visitors, just those considered at risk of failing to return home.

He also announced that more than one million fingerprints had been collected from foreign nationals planning to visit the UK as part of its biometrics visas programme.

The proposals were set out in a Home Office paper that also floated the idea of cutting the length of tourist visas and creating a new business visa and a one-off visa for such events as the 2012 Olympics.

The Labour-controlled Home Affairs Select Committee also wrote yesterday to the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith to call on her to pay the proposed police wage rise in full.

She is refusing to backdate the 2.5 per cent rise to September and has paid it from this month, effectively trimming it to 1.9 per cent.

It said the Government should "honour the recommendations of the independent tribunal. This is a question of trust".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in