Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Government ordered to reveal which companies were in ‘VIP lane’ for Covid contracts

Names of 47 firms handed PPE deals must be shared, says Information Commissioner

Adam Forrest
Monday 18 October 2021 14:26 BST
Comments
(PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Boris Johnson’s government has been ordered to reveal the names of all the companies in a special “VIP lane” for contracts handed out during the Covid crisis.

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has told the health department it must disclose the names of the companies fast-tracked to supply personal protective equipment (PPE) during the pandemic.

The government has been accused of cronyism after it emerged that firms linked to the Conservative Party were given access to a High Priority Lane – dubbed the “VIP lane” by campaigners.

The ICO said the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) had “failed to comply” with Freedom of Information rules by refusing to release the names of the 47 firms given priority.

The department has been given 35 days to hand over the information to the Good Law Project – which has accused ministers of “sleazy pandemic procurement” – following the group’s request for details.

The campaign group has brought legal proceedings against the government’s fast-track system for PPE contracts – arguing it was unlawful for companies with political connections to be prioritised for deals while other firms had to wait in line.

The government has argued that a VIP lane was a “perfectly reasonable and rational” solution to the large number of offers to supply equipment at the beginning of the pandemic.

Deals totalling £12.5bn for masks, gloves and gowns and other personal equipment have come under intense scrutiny after the National Audit Office revealed that companies placed on a “VIP list” through contacts with politicians and senior officials were 10 times more likely to win contracts in the early months of the pandemic.

The spending watchdog said last year that ministers had not demonstrated they spent billions of pounds on PPE in a way that was “fair and transparent”.

On Thursday, the Information Commissioner wrote: “The DHSC has not disclosed the requested information, nor advised the Commissioner that it considers it is otherwise exempt by virtue of another exemption. The DHSC has therefore failed to comply with its obligations under FOIA.”

The letter sent to the DHSC also warned that “failure to comply may result in the Commissioner making written certification of this fact to the High Court … and may be dealt with as a contempt of court”.

Jo Maugham, director of Good Law Project, said: “Cronyism carries a double cost. It empties the public purse into the pockets of friends of the government. And it leads to bad outcomes for public health.

He added: “Good Law Project, which first revealed the existence of the VIP lanes for PPE and Test and Trace, will continue the difficult but important work of exposing the truth around the government’s sleazy pandemic procurement.”

It comes as the government revealed that Michael Gove and fellow Cabinet Office minister Lord Agnew referred six firms down a “fast track” route in their efforts to land Test and Trace contracts.

In a response to the Good Law Project, the Cabinet Office confirmed “a total of 6 offers of help” were received to a VIP email “from the Private Office of Michael Gove and the Private Office of Lord Agnew”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in